What can lead to a formal hearing being scheduled after an informal hearing?

A formal hearing is scheduled after an informal hearing primarily when there are issues of disputed fact that need resolution. During an informal hearing, the objective typically is to clarify issues, engage in discussions, and potentially reach an agreement based on the presented facts. However, if certain facts are contested or there are disagreements regarding critical evidence or interpretations related to the case, then a formal hearing becomes necessary.

In a formal hearing, a more structured process takes place, often involving a hearing officer and the opportunity for both parties to present their cases fully, including witness testimonies and cross-examinations. This step is crucial for ensuring that all perspectives are considered comprehensively and fairly in situations where consensus on the facts cannot be reached.

In contrast, if all parties agree on the facts, there would likely be no need for a formal hearing, as an agreement simplifies the resolution process. Similarly, a lack of witnesses or a consensus among the panel would not inherently lead to the necessity of a formal hearing; in these instances, other resolutions could be considered depending on the circumstances.