What characterizes the proceedings of the probable cause panel?

The proceedings of the probable cause panel are characterized by being similar to a grand jury. This comparison highlights the investigative nature of the probable cause panel, which reviews evidence and determines whether there is sufficient ground to proceed with formal charges against a licensee. In both scenarios, the focus is on evaluating the merits of the case based on the evidence presented, rather than conducting a trial.

Unlike grand jury proceedings, which are often secretive and exclusively reserved for felony cases, a probable cause panel provides a similar function in the context of licensing complaints without requiring a jury of peers or public accessibility. The panel does not operate under the same formal judicial court processes that a standard trial would, and typically does not involve a judge conducting the proceedings as a vital decision-maker.

Understanding this characteristic is important as it emphasizes that while there may be procedural similarities regarding the structure and function of these panels, the setting and legal implications can differ significantly from traditional court procedures.